Universal jurisdiction and international crimes: Constraints and best practices
This report summarises the proceedings of a workshop organised by the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights (DROI), in association with the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE). Academics and practitioners discussed international trends as regards the concept of universal jurisdiction and the EU’s approach to promoting universal jurisdiction through its external relations, as well as practical experience in applying universal jurisdiction in the fight against impunity in Europe. The experts agreed that universal jurisdiction can play a role as part of a wider accountability strategy, complementary to international courts and prosecutions on other jurisdictional bases. They recommended more specialised training for investigators, prosecutors, judges and law enforcement staff for universal jurisdiction cases and more cooperation at EU and international level. Speakers supported the initiative for a multilateral treaty on mutual legal assistance and extradition. Special attention in universal jurisdiction cases must be given to victims seeking justice, including for sexual and gender-based crimes.
Study
External author
Julia KREBS, Cedric RYNGAERT, Florian JEßBERGER
About this document
Publication type
Keyword
- competence of the Member States
- cooperation policy
- crime against humanity
- criminal law
- EU competence
- European construction
- EUROPEAN UNION
- European Union law
- extradition
- extraterritorial jurisdiction
- impunity
- international affairs
- international court
- International Criminal Court
- INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS
- INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
- judicial cooperation
- LAW
- multilateral agreement
- organisation of the legal system
- rights and freedoms
- the EU's international role
- war crime
- world organisations